Check out our new site. www.titanfit.com

Looking for TitanFit? Go to our new site. www.titanfit.com










Monday 090831

Workout

Press
Find a NEW 1RM

Then
"Mini" MetCon
1 rounds of:
500m Row / 400m Run
20 - Box Jumps

Compare to:
TITANFIT: Monday 090706

Tomorrow Back Squat!

Sunday 090830

REST!

Saturday 080929

Team WOD!

Friday 090828

Workout

Dead Lift!

Thursaday 090827

Workout

For time:
800m run
100 Pull-up

800m run
100 push-ups

Scared? Don't be. Partition as needed. The very strong might do a mile run then all of the push-ups and pull-ups. It might be best to break it into manageable sets (e.g.) a 400m run, 25 pull-ups, followed by a 400m run with 25 push-ups...or 200m runs and 12-13 of each.

Wednesday 090826

Workout

For time:
Row 500M/Run 400M
15 - 95 lbs SDHP

Row 500M/Run 400M
15 - 95 lbs Thrusters

Row 500M/Run 400M
15- 95 lbs SDHP

Row 500M/Run 400M
15 - 95 lbs Thrusters

Compare to:
TITANFIT: Thursday 080424


Heart group: Cut back — way back — on extra sugar

AP Tue Aug 25th, 2009 7:28 AM EDT

DALLAS - A spoonful of sugar ? Americans are swallowing 22 teaspoons of sugar each day, and it's time to cut way back, the American Heart Association says.

Most of that added sugar comes from soft drinks and candy — a whopping 355 calories and the equivalent of guzzling two cans of soda and eating a chocolate bar .

By comparison, most women should be getting no more than 6 teaspoons a day, or 100 calories, of added sugar — the sweeteners and syrups that are added to foods during processing, preparation or at the table. For most men, the recommended limit is 9 teaspoons, or 150 calories, the heart group says.

The guidelines do not apply to naturally occurring sugars like those found in fruit, vegetables or dairy products .

Rachel K. Johnson, lead author of the statement published online Monday in the American Heart Association journal Circulation, said it was time to give specific advice on how much added sugar Americans should be getting, not just advising moderation.

"Take a good hard look at your diet," said Johnson, professor of nutrition at the University of Vermont in Burlington. "Figure out where the sources of added sugars are and think about how to cut back on that."

She said about 8 ounces of fruit-flavored yogurt has about 6 teaspoons of added sugar; 8 ounces of low-fat chocolate milk has about 4 teaspoons; a cup of frosted whole grain cereal has about 3 teaspoons.

The biggest culprits for the glut of sugar? Soft drinks by far, followed by candy, cakes, cookies and pies.

With about 8 teaspoons of added sugar, a regular 12-ounce soft drink will put most women over the recommended daily limit.

Cutting back on sugar likely won't be easy for many people, said Lona Sandon, a dietitian at Dallas' University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center .

"I think it's probably going to be a struggle for quite a few people," Sandon said.

Calculating one's sugar intake can be tricky as the government doesn't require labels to differentiate added sugars from naturally occurring sugars, said Johnson. But she points out that the biggest sources, like regular soft drinks and sweets, are pretty obvious. And the U.S. Department of Agriculture has a database for the added sugar in some foods.

To check for added sugar, look for a variety of ingredients including sugar, corn syrup, fructose, dextrose, molasses or evaporated cane juice on the label.

The heart group didn't recommend general limits for added sugar for children; a national health survey has shown that boys ages 14 to 18 consume an eye-popping 34 teaspoons of added sugar a day.

Sandon said that parents can help lower that sugar intake by getting soda out of the house, looking at how much sugar is in their kids' cereal and substituting snacks like cookies with popcorn.

Johnson concedes that sugar does play an important role in enhancing the taste of food, adding: "If you feel like, 'I just can't live with this low amount of sugar in my diet,' then what you need to do is up your energy needs."

In other words, she said, get moving. A man in his early 20s who walks more than three miles a day could consume about 288 calories, or about 18 teaspoons, of added sugar.

The statement says data indicates added sugar is contributing to Americans consuming too many discretionary calories — the number of calories remaining after a person eats the foods needed to meet nutrient requirements.

"We know for sure that if you are consuming excessive amounts of added sugar, you will add calories, which leads to weight gain , or you will displace other essential nutrients ," she said.

On average, most women need about 1,800 calories a day and most men need about 2,200, Johnson said.

If someone drinks their daily calorie needs in soft drinks , they will be maintaining their weight, but won't be getting any nutrients, she said.

Wahida Karmally, nutrition director at Columbia University's Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, said that with these guidelines, it's important to remember overall moderation. Some people, for instance, might be doing fine in their sugar consumption but are overdoing it on fat.

"I don't want people to go back thinking if I just cut back on teaspoons of sugar I'm going to be very healthy," she said.
__
On the Net:
American Heart Association: www.americanheart.org/nutrition/sugar

U.S. Department of Agriculture's database listing added sugars in certain foods: http://tinyurl.com/nacqhr

Tuesday 090825

Workout

Hang Power Snatch
80% of 1RM x2 x5

Then "Mini" MetCon

3x
10-KB Swings
10-Ring Push-up
10-Box Jumps
10-Sit-ups

Here's last year's TitanFit FGB (Fight Gone Bad)...

Monday 090824

Workout

90% of Friday 090731's effort
x2 x6

"Mini MetCon"
10 rounds of "Cindy"

Compare to:
TITANFIT: Friday 090731

Sunday 090823

Rest!

Saturday 090822

Work on Weakness!

If you don't like it, do it today! For me that means a long run...

Friday 090821

Workout

For time:
800M Run/1000M row then...
5 Rounds:
10 - SDHP (Guys use 95# and Ladies use 65#)
10 - Ring Dips
10 - Ab Mat Sit-ups

Compare to:
TITANFIT: Saturday 071117

Thursday 090820

Workout

As we had no takers on 090810, I have reposted "Karen"!
150 - Wall Ball Shots

Compare to:
TITANFIT: Monday 090810

Wednesday 090819

What your favorite 4-letter word that starts with "F"? If you are a CrossFit'er it is undoubtedly "FRAN"!

Workout

(Rain WOD)
5 rounds of:
9 - 95 lbs Thrusters
9 - Pull-ups

(No Rain WOD)
7 rounds of:
5 - 95 lbs Power Snatches
200m Run

Hey TitanFit'ers...are you interested in improving your rowing abilities? Caitlin, of the IRC (http://www.indyrowing.org) and a recent visitor to TitanFit, is teaching a "learn to erg class" at IRC.

The class runs October 19 - November 11, Mondays and Wednesdays 6:30-8 p.m. There is a discount for TitanFit members. If you are interested and need more information, we will provide her contact information.

Tuesday 090818

OK gang....

My bad as I have not yet posted info on this year's Fight Gone Bad Fund Raiser...Fight Gone Bad IV takes place on Saturday, September 26, 2009.

The event can take place at Affiliate facilities between 6am and 4pm. The event format is the Fight Gone Bad CrossFit format. In this workout you move from each of five stations after a minute. This is a five-minute round from which a one-minute break is allowed before repeating. The event is in the 3 round format.

The stations are:
Wall-ball: 20 pound ball, 10 ft target. (Reps)
Sumo dead lift high-pull: 75 pounds (Reps)
Box Jump: 20″ box (Reps)
Push-press: 75 pounds (Reps)
Row: calories (Calories)

NOW YOU KNOW! More info on TitanFit's entry soon to come!

Workout
Dead Lift
80% of 1RM x5, x4, x3, x2, x1 (add 5 lbs to 090707's effort)

AFTER
"Mini MetCon"

Tabata Row!

Monday 090817

Warm-up
Over Head Lunges

Workout
Power/Strength

Rack Jerk:

Compare to:
TITANFIT: Tuesday 090714


"Linda" for those that are ADVENTURES!

Sunday 090816

REST!

Well not really. We are doing a 20 - 30 mile bike ride in the morning. If you are interested, we are meeting in Avon. Give a call to join in!

Saturday 090815

Team WOD!

Friday 090814

Workout

Work up to:
Clean & Jerk - 80% (of 1RM) x1 x6

THEN

"Mini" MetCon

15-10-5 reps for time:
Pull-ups
Box jump (Tall)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_med_breast_cancer_weightlifting/print

Study: Weightlifting helps breast cancer survivors
By MARILYNN MARCHIONE, AP Medical Writer Marilynn Marchione, Ap Medical Writer
Thu Aug 13, 2:08 am ET

Breast cancer survivors have been getting bum advice. For decades, many doctors warned that lifting weights or even heavy groceries could cause painful arm swelling. New research shows that weight training actually helps prevent this problem.

"How many generations of women have been told to avoid lifting heavy objects?" Dr. Eric Winer, breast cancer chief at the Dana-Farber Cancer Center in Boston, lamented after seeing the surprising results of the new study. "Women who were doing the lifting actually had fewer arm problems because they had better muscle tone."

The study was led by Kathryn Schmitz, an exercise scientist at the University of Pennsylvania, and funded by the federal government. Results are in Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine.

More than 2.4 million Americans are breast cancer survivors, and the study could mean a big difference in their quality of life. Cancer treatment-related arm swelling now appears to be one of many ailments made better by exercise — not worse, Schmitz said.

"Fifty years ago we told people who had a heart attack not to exercise anymore," and people with sore backs to heal with bed rest, Schmitz said. "It was well-meaning advice but it was polar opposite of the truth."

Women who have had radiation to the armpit, or lymph nodes removed to check for cancer, can suffer lymphedema — a buildup of fluids that causes painful and unsightly swelling of the arms or hands.

To avoid it, doctors have advised women to avoid using the affected arm to lift toddlers, carry a heavy purse or scrub floors. Even activities like golf and tennis raised concern.

Women think, "Oh, my God, I need to baby the arm," Schmitz said.

Lifting weights — which boosts mood, muscle mass, bone strength and weight control — was thought to be a bad idea for women prone to lymphedema.

Schmitz challenged that notion with a small study several years ago, finding that weight training did not make lymphedema worse. Her new study is the first one large and long enough to give clear proof that this is so, and even suggests that weightlifting can help.

It involved 141 breast cancer survivors who had suffered lymphedema. Half were told not to change their exercise habits. The rest were given 90-minute weightlifting classes twice a week for 13 weeks at community gyms, mostly YMCAs.

They wore a custom-fitted compression garment on the affected arm and gradually worked up to more challenging weights and repetitions. For the next 39 weeks, they continued these exercises on their own.

The women's arms were measured monthly. After one year, fewer weightlifters had suffered lymphedema flare-ups — 14 percent versus 29 percent of the others. Weightlifters reported fewer symptoms and greater strength. Rates of change in arm size due to swelling were similar in both groups.

"I found it was really very effective. It not only gave me strength and mobility but it improved my balance and coordination," said one participant, Clare Faber, 66, of suburban Philadelphia. "It really does offer women hope."

Another participant, Gay McArthur, 56, of Smithfield, N.J., has continued weightlifting on her own since the study ended.

"When I first got diagnosed with lymphedema, they said I couldn't lift more than five pounds," she said. But weight training caused no problems and has made her feel better, she said.

It also should save money, though the study did not measure this, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried, of the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, wrote in an editorial in the medical journal. In the study, the group of weightlifters made only 77 visits to doctors or physical therapists for lymphedema flare-ups versus 195 visits for the others, she noted.

Another part of the study is evaluating whether weight training can prevent a first case of lymphedema in breast cancer survivors; results are expected soon, Schmitz said.

Breast cancer survivors should not rush into weight training — that could trigger problems. Schmitz suggests:

_Have a certified fitness professional teach you how to do the exercises properly.

_Start slow, with a program that gradually progresses.

_Wear a well-fitting compression garment during workouts.

On the Net:

New England Journal: http://www.nejm.org

Lymphedema advice: http://tinyurl.com/l9lgga

Thursday 090813

Workout:
For time:

Body Weight* Back Squat x30
800M run

Body Weight Back Squat x10
400M run

*Or 70% of your 1Rm if you are unable to achieve BWT for 40 reps...the bar plus necessary plates that equal your body weight. Error on the high side.

Compare to:
TITANFIT: 071015

Wednesday 090812

Workout

Snatch Grip Dead Lift + Snatch Shrug
Work up to 120% of your Snatch 1RM x2, 2, 2, 2, 2

Tuesday 090811

Workout
TABATA!

Perform the following exercises for 8 rounds of 20 seconds work (in any order), 10 seconds rest:
Rowing*
Air squat
Push-ups
Pull-ups
Sit-ups

After the 8th round of each exercise, rest 1 minute before proceeding to the next. The lowest number of reps achieved in any of the 8 rounds is the score for that particular exercise (calories burned in place of reps are used for rowing). The sum of the scores for all of the exercises gives the score for the entire workout.

*Those without access to a rower, do SDHP with a 45 lbs barbell for each 20 second segment.

Compare to:
TITANFIT: Saturday 090502

Monday 090810

Warm-up!

Skills
Tuttle recommends Handstands and Double Unders...

Workout
(No Rain)

3x
200M Farmers Walk
10 - Burpees

50M Lunges
10 - Burpees

10 - Box Jumps
10 - Burpees

(Rain)
"Karen"
150 - Wall Ball Shots

Sunday 090809

REST!

Saturday 090808

Don't forget today's WOD is at Dr. Rick's house.



Are Low Carb Diets Over-rated for Health and Longevity? The Kitavan and Okinawa Diets.

Posted By Mike OD On August 3, 2009 @ 6:00 am In Food & Cooking, Prevention & Wellness


In a previous article “Are Very Low Carb Diets Over-rated for Weight Loss [1]“, we looked at comparing very popular diet approaches such as Atkins vs South Beach/Zone diets for the benefits of losing weight. What was the verdict? Well, we saw that with a same protein and calorie load, there was no advantages in weight loss for any…as they all worked. We also saw that having some days of higher carbohydrate intakes allowed for the hormone leptin to increase (which also ties in with metabolic rate). So now we are going to look at another aspect, health and longevity, when it comes to carbohydrate intake.

The Kitavan Diet
In a series of papers on the study of the native people from Kitava (island in Papua New Guinea), we come across a very healthy….and high carb eating society (Gasp! I’ll let the shock set in as many may have thought carbs are evil…but we’ll talk more about that later). Here’s an abstract from the study [2] that sums up the results.

This study examined cross-sectional age relations of blood pressure, anthropometric indexes, serum lipids, and hemostatic variables in 203 subsistence horticulturists aged 20-86 y in Kitava, Trobriand Islands, Papua New Guinea. The population is characterized by extreme leanness (despite food abundance), low blood pressure, low plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 activity, and rarity of cardiovascular disease. Tubers, fruit, fish, and coconut are dietary staples whereas dairy products, refined fat and sugar, cereals, and alcohol are absent and salt intake is low.

also Stephen @ Whole Health Source [3] expanded a bit more on these numbers for the Kitavans, and makes an interesting relation…

Kitavans eat a diet of root vegetables, coconut, fruit, vegetables and fish and have undetectable levels of cardiovascular disease (CVD), stroke and overweight. Despite smoking like chimneys. 69% of their calories come from carbohydrate, 21% from fat and 10% from protein. This is essentially a carbohydrate-heavy version of what our paleolithic ancestors ate.

The first thing we can say is that a high intake of carbohydrate is not enough, by itself, to cause overweight or the diseases of civilization. It’s also not enough to cause insulin resistance.

Essentially you have a natural group of people who are as a whole very lean (although they are not starving, and eat plenty of calories), healthy, have good skin, strong teeth and suffer from virtually none of all the “diseases of civilization” (obesity, heart diseases, cancers) that are increasing at an alarming rate…oh yeah, did we mention they also eat a high intake of carbs and saturated fat (mostly from coconuts) in the process?

The Okinawa Diet
Next up we have the Okinawans, living off the coast of Japan and most studied for their history of health and longevity. They too are a group of people with excellent health, virtually no “diseases of civilization,” live long and functional (no “aging diseases” like loss of memory or movement)…all while having higher intake of calories from carbohydrates (upwards of 50-60%).
The Okinawa way isn’t a magic diet or exercise plan – it’s a lifestyle. There’s nothing complicated about it. Okinawa’s enjoy simple lives and they eat from the earth. That’s it. No plan, no time limit, no weighing, no beginning and no end. Okinawa’s have remarkably clean arteries and low cholesterol. Heart disease, breast cancer and prostate cancer are rare. This can be attributed to the Okinawans mostly plant based diet that includes fish and soy foods with a variety of vegetables and a moderate amounts of good fats. They consume locally grown vegetables and large quantities of tofu (high protein, low-fat, calcium, vitiman E) and seaweed (higher in vitamin and minerals than land vegetables).

from Associated Content story - The Okinawa Diet: The Key to Longevity?

What you do find in common with the Kitavans is the source of those carbs comes mainly all from vegetables (notably sweet potato). While there are also numbers for fat/protein that seem to change depending on who you ask….cutting through the %s, the sources are still whole and natural such as seafood or pork and cooking with lard (not vegetable oils).

Not All Carbs are Created Equal
Ok, we have seen just 2 examples of high carb eating societies of people that can live long and prosper (yes I know what I just said, must have been from seeing the new Star Trek movie). But the real debate should not be about exact %s of carbs in a diet, but WHAT are the sources of those carbs. If we take a graph from a previous article Obesity, Diabetes, and Other Diseases vs Food Trends in Pictures [4], we will “see” where the major changes have occured.



More calories and more carbs over time.



Carb sources increasing in cereal grains and sugar.

The pictures speak for themselves……calories have increased…..even though carbs have increased (while protein and fat has not)….the biggest increases of carbs now comes from cereal grains and sugar. Can we see a trend with increased obesity/disease and what is going on above?

Going into this a bit more, here is a good excerpt from Ryan @ Matters to Me [5] who explains the difference in carbs:

T.L. Cleave, who wrote an important book called The Saccharine Disease. In this book, Cleave notes that the rural Zulu of Africa (in the 1950s) were in good health on a diet comprised of 90% carbohydrate calories. In contrast, the urban Zulu ate less carbohydrates (81%), yet had more diseases than the rural Zulu. Cleave concluded that the amount of carbs being eaten by the two groups didn’t matter so much as the types of carbs. This seemed to make all the difference: the rural population ate maize and root vegetables while the city-dwellers consumed refined, industrialized carbs, such as sugar and white flour.

..it’s not as simple as whole foods vs. refined foods — it’s also a matter of the qualities of the foods. To illustrate this, let’s evaluate two of the evils that Cleave proclaims to be the cause of modern man’s health demise. On one hand we have white flour: a starch — also known chemically as a polysaccharide — which is broken down to glucose in the body. Sugar, on the other hand, is a disaccharide with a significant difference: it’s composed of glucose and fructose, which the body handles quite differently than it does starch.

A high flux of fructose to the liver, the main organ capable of metabolizing this simple carbohydrate, disturbs normal hepatic carbohydrate metabolism leading to two major consequences… perturbations in glucose metabolism and glucose uptake pathways, and a significantly enhanced rate of de novo lipogenesis and TG [triglyceride] synthesis, driven by the high flux of glycerol and acyl portions of TG molecules coming from fructose catabolism. These metabolic disturbances appear to underlie the induction of insulin resistance commonly observed with high fructose feeding in both humans and animal models.

As well, this is also a great observation made by Matt at 180 Degree Health [6]:

So carbohydrates raise insulin levels temporarily to store away glucose into cells. Is that a bad thing? Of course it’s not. The rise and fall of insulin is no different than the rise and fall of your chest as your breathe.

The biggest flaw; however, is the idea that repeatedly raising insulin levels will somehow trigger insulin resistance over time. This is nonsense. The rural Zulu’s and modern day Kitavans, who both eat insulin-raising carbohydrates at every meal never went on to show signs of insulin resistance. They didn’t show signs of it because THEY WEREN’T INSULIN RESISTANT! Insulin resistance is something that appears to be triggered only in a reduced metabolic state – something I’ve reasonably concluded by following the work of Broda Barnes and Mark Starr – two men who reported never seeing a case of type II diabetes (severe insulin resistance) occur in someone with a closely monitored metabolism.

Since the only known substance that can reliably trigger insulin resistance in humans and animal subjects – something that was also introduced at the onset of modern disease – and something that has been associated with insulin resistance syndromes such as hypoglycemia, poor glucose tolerance testing, cavities and so on for going on a century is sugar. Not just any sugar, as straight glucose from starchy foods absolutely cannot induce insulin resistance – but fructose. Not surprisingly, the consumption of fructose is one of the two largest dietary changes to take place during mankind’s “ascent” to modernism.

So What’s the Real Answer?

When it comes to carbs, it is the source that seems to be of vital importance for health and longevity (which includes obesity that can come from a malfunctioning glucose metabolism). We have seen healthy societies with various %s (high and low) of carb intake but they all have one big thing in common…..they all eat natural “real foods”. They also have another thing in common, once people from their culture move into a more “modernized” food environment, then the health benefits seen previously decrease dramatically.

There doesn’t have to be just one way for health (and there usually never is). So don’t spend most of your time worrying about some magic macronutrient % and focus instead on getting your glucose metabolism fixed in the first place (especially your liver). Whether you choose to eat very low carb, moderate carb or higher carb… just keep these simple basic rules below in mind:

Have a Active Lifestyle Mindset (make it part of your lifestyle, something you enjoy, an active hobby whether alone or with friends/family)
Stop Stressing Out, Relax and Enjoy Each Day (including just being present and relaxing when you eat, and not stuffing your face mindlessly)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Article printed from Fitness Spotlight: http://www.fitnessspotlight.com

URL to article: http://www.fitnessspotlight.com/2009/08/03/carb-diets-overrated-part-ii-kitavan-okinawa-diets/

URLs in this post:

[1] Are Very Low Carb Diets Over-rated for Weight Loss: http://www.fitnessspotlight.com/2009/06/04/carb-diets-overrated-weight-loss/
[2] abstract from the study: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9322559
[3] Stephen @ Whole Health Source: http://wholehealthsource.blogspot.com/2008/08/kitava-wrapping-it-up.html
[4] Obesity, Diabetes, and Other Diseases vs Food Trends in Pictures: http://www.fitnessspotlight.com/2009/04/20/obesity-diabetes-food-trends-pictures/
[5] Ryan @ Matters to Me: http://ryan-koch.blogspot.com/2009/03/can-high-carb-low-fat-be-healthy.html
[6] Matt at 180 Degree Health: http://180degreehealth.blogspot.com/2009/07/low-carb-oops.html
[7] FREE shopping list here: http://www.fitnessspotlight.com/university/nutrition/ShoppingList.pdf

Friday 090807

Workout:
Pull-up ladder!
Do 1 pull-up the first minute, 2, the second, 3 the third. Continue until you can not complete the required number of pull-ups for the given minute.

Upon failure, rest 3 minutes.


Then Push-up ladder. Very same concept. Doesn't that sound fun?

Compare to:
TITANFIT: Friday 090626

Kelly Clarkson Does CrossFit!
http://www.etonline.com/news/2009/08/77270/


Kelly Clarkson looks fresh and radiant on the cover of the new SELF magazine, but has the singer -- who admits to ups and downs with her weight -- been Photoshopped?

"Yes, of course we do post-production corrections on our images," Editor-in-Chief Lucy Danziger tells ET. Airbrushing images is an industry standard, and the mag stands behind its decision.

"SELF magazine inspires and informs our 6 million readers each month to reach their all around best," Lucy adds. "Kelly Clarkson exudes confidence, and is a great role model for women of all sizes and stages of their life. She works out and is strong and healthy, and our picture shows her confidence and beauty. She literally glows from within. That is the feeling we'd all want to have. We love this cover and we love Kelly Clarkson."

For her part, Kelly has been constant in saying she is happy with who she is, Photoshop or not. She even joked about seeing the album cover for All I Ever Wanted, saying on her blog: "It's very colorful, and they have definitely Photoshopped the crap out of me, but I don't care! Whoever she is, she looks great."

"My happy weight changes," she tells SELF. "Sometimes I eat more; sometimes I play more. I'll be different sizes all the time. When people talk about my weight, I'm like, 'You seem to have a problem with it; I don't. I'm fine!' I've never felt uncomfortable on the red carpet or anything."

Recently, the "American Idol" winner has gotten into a workout program called Crossfit, which she says has given her more energy on stage.

Posted August 06, 2009 10:20:00 AM

Thursday 090806

Happy Birthday Mr. Moninger!

Workout
Snatch Balance + OHS (complete one of each before re-racking the bar)
Work to 110% of your SN 1RM

REST Then

"Mini MetCon"
5x 250M row 5 Burpees

Compare to:
TITANFIT: Wednesday 090506:


Let's hope my Mini MetCon will be better than the following!

Wednesday 090805

Happy Birthday John (AKA FOOS)

Warm-up
using 45 lbs bar
Clean Drops x3 x3
Over Head Lunges x3 x3

Workout
Workout:
Hang Power Clean (HPCL)
1-1-1-1-1-1-1

Compare to:
TITANFIT: Sunday 081012

Tuesday 090804

Workout

AMRAP in 30:00 of:

400M Run or 500M Row
10 - Ring Dips or 3/1 Bench Dips
10 - KTE or 2/1 Knee Raises

Monday 090803

Workout

CrossFit Total (CFT)
1RM for:
Squat
Press
Dead Lift

Compare to:
TITANFIT: Friday 090501

JLR: Health benefits of physical activity more pronounced in women
July 30, 2009--

Many experimental studies have found that physical exercise can improve cholesterol levels and subsequently decrease the risks of cardiovascular disease; however, few of these studies have included enough participant diversity to provide ethnic breakdowns. Now, a long-term study of over 8,700 middle-aged men and women provides race- and gender- specific data on the cholesterol effects of physical activity, with the interesting result that women, particularly African-American women, experience greater benefits as a result of exercise than men.

The analysis of this large Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, which appears in the August issue of Journal of Lipid Research, was carried out by Keri Monda and colleagues at North Carolina and Baylor. They found that over a 12 year period, all individuals who increased their exercise by about 180 metabolic units per week (equivalent to an additional hour of mild or 30 minutes of moderate activity per week) displayed decreased levels of triglycerides and increased levels of the "good" HDL cholesterol. However, statistically significant decreases in the "bad" LDL cholesterol were only observed in women, with particularly strong effects in menopausal women and African-American women. And total cholesterol levels were only significantly decreased in African-American women.

The authors speculate that these novel differences may arise from hormonal differences between the sexes, especially considering the extra effects seen post-menopause. The racial differences observed may stem from genetic variations that require further exploration.

The authors do also note that their exercise data was assessed by questionnaire and this was non-scientific, though the particular methodology used has been extremely reliable in other studies. They also note that all evaluated participants were healthy, so these results cannot be generalized to individuals with diabetes or those on cholesterol-lowering medications.

Citation:

Monda KL, Ballantyne CM, North KE. "Longitudinal impact of physical activity on lipid profiles in middle-aged adults: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study." Journal of Lipid Research, Vol. 50, 1685-1691, August 2009.

Sunday 090802

Happy BDay Megan!